vague
ENACT
CLS TASKS
The RIO-03 Combined Mean Dynamic Topography (CMDT)
 
The direct method
The synthetic method
CMDT versus OCCAM, Levitus and Le Grand
CMDT RIO-03 References
 





  The Synthetic Method

Description


From each SLA η' , if an in-situ measurement h is available, the difference between this two heights bring the MDT h93-99:

  Results

Hence, by collecting worldwide hydrographic data since 1993, then computing dynamic heights, SLA from ERS-1, ERS-2, T/P, Jason-1, EnviSat or GFO can be associated at the same position and time, using a space-time objective analysis. By subtracting the SLA, we obtain a set of local estimate of the MDT relative to the 1993-1999 period. To reduce noise, these estmates are box averaged (1°x0.5°), assuming that the MDT scales are twice larger:

box averaged local MDT estimates with hydrographic data

In a similar way, assuming geostrophy, geostrophic velocity deduced from surface drifters can be used together with geostrophic velocities (anomalies) computed with altimetric slopes. To do so, the Surface Velocity Program drifters from 1993 to 2000 are processed and corrected from the wind driven effects [2]. The local estimates of mean geostrophic velocities are also box averaged (1°x0.5°):

zonal local estimates of the mean geostrophic velocities      meridional local estimates of the mean geostrophic velocities

All these height and velocity estimates are combined in a multivariate objective analysis [4], [5] in order to improve locally the guess computed with the direct method. The figure below illustrates where local estimates are improving the guess, along western boundary currents and the circumpolar current:

 

Variance of local MDT estimates relative to the guess


The direct method
The synthetic method
CMDT versus OCCAM, Levitus and Le Grand
CMDT RIO-03 References
Copyright © 1999-2004 CLS. All rights reserved. Latest Update: 10/02/2004